Justice as Fairness: A Restatement John Rawls
Publisher: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press

Retrieved from https://books.google.com.ph. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement by John Rawls Thirty years later, Justice as Fairness rearticulates the main themes of his earlier work and defends it against the swarm of criticisms it has attracted. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Taking back/reworking aspects of A Theory of Justice, I.e. At the time slightly more faithfully (still: to understand Rawls' later work, one needs to read his Political Liberalism (John Dewey Essays in Philosophy) and, perhaps, also his (2001) Justice as Fairness: A Restatement). Rawls emphasizes in his books that there must be fairness regardless of social status. [3] https://www.pscj.appstate.edu/johnrawls.html. See, for example, John Rawls, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. It is a fundamental rule pertaining on how to organize the society. Inserting public reason/overlapping consensus stuff while removing the Kantian basis of Justice as Fairness, in Political Liberalism/Justice As Fairness: Restatement. Rawls aims to express an essential part of the common core of the democratic tradition–justice as fairness–and to provide an alternative to utilitarianism, which had dominated the Anglo-Saxon tradition of political thought since the 19th century. Shaw, Barry, and Sansbury (2009) identify justice as fairness which is attributed to the fair treatment to a number of groups of people. Thus there is the concept of veil of . Here's something from John Rawls' Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (p. [3] Furthermore, justice has principles that the free and rational people use in order to maintain equality and provide solutions to problems in the society to eventually obtain what we call fairness. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2001), pp. 62) (with apologies for the black background).